The debate over birthright citizenship in the United States reached a pivotal moment as the Supreme Court struck down an executive order limiting citizenship rights. This decision has sparked reactions from various political figures and organizations, reflecting the complex sentiments surrounding immigration policies.
Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers, along with attorneys general from 17 other states, signed an amicus brief supporting an executive order issued in January 2025 by former President Trump. The order aimed to restrict citizenship for children born in the U.S. to mothers who were either undocumented or on a temporary visa, unless the father held U.S. citizenship or permanent residency. Despite its intent, the Supreme Court rejected this order in a 6-3 ruling, affirming that birthright citizenship applies to all children born on U.S. soil.
The court’s decision aligns with the precedent set by United States v. Wong Kim Ark, guaranteeing citizenship irrespective of parents’ immigration status. This ruling underscores the constitutional guarantee of citizenship “whether born to permanent residents or temporary visitors.”
ACLU of Nebraska’s Reaction
The ACLU of Nebraska criticized Hilgers’ support for the executive order, labeling it a misuse of state resources. Executive Director Mindy Rush Chipman emphasized the need for accountability, stating, “We feel Nebraskans need to know that our attorney general supported the overturning of birthright citizenship and in fact, used state time and resources to do it.”
She further called for an apology from Hilgers, asserting that his actions contributed to uncertainty among Nebraska families. “The Supreme Court’s opinion really just affirms that birthright citizenship is part of the fabric of our nation,” Rush Chipman added, highlighting the relief brought by the court’s decision.
Relief for Immigrant Families
The Center for Immigrant and Refugee Advancement (CIRA) expressed relief over the ruling. Attorney Sydney Wurdeman stated that the decision reassures their clients of their protected rights, noting that both clients and staff had been anxious about the implications of the executive order. “CIRA is very excited that the Supreme Court decided to uphold birthright citizenship,” Wurdeman said.
Political Party Responses
The Nebraska Republican Party expressed disappointment in the court’s decision. Chairman Mary Jane Truemper underscored their belief in the executive order’s legal rationale, suggesting that Congress should now address the policy question. “We’ll be watching closely and will support Nebraska’s congressional delegation if they take the lead,” Truemper noted.
Conversely, the Nebraska Democratic Party celebrated the ruling, with Chair Jane Kleeb affirming the decision as a reinforcement of a core American promise. Latino Caucus Chair Jennifer Reyna highlighted the relief it brings to Latino and immigrant families, emphasizing the importance of constitutional protections.
José Flores Jr., Secretary of the Latino Caucus, echoed these sentiments, stating, “Families across this nation can breathe a sigh of relief that all children born on U.S. soil are indeed citizens with all guaranteed rights, regardless of their parents’ origin.”
