Michigan State University Trustees Face New Ethics Policy Deadline
As Michigan State University (MSU) trustees approach a critical deadline, the institution’s board is embroiled in a debate over an updated ethics policy. This policy is intended to fortify board responsibilities, yet some critics perceive it as a mechanism to stifle dissent within the board.
During a special board meeting held on a Sunday night, the trustees approved the policy changes with a 5-3 vote. Concurrently, President Kevin Guskiewicz’s salary was nearly doubled to $2 million to mitigate concerns about his possible departure.
The revised policy mandates trustees to align with majority board decisions, maintain the university’s reputation, refrain from sharing false information, and protect confidential data. Trustees are expected to act in accordance with fiduciary duties, including loyalty.
Non-compliance could lead to public censure, restricted access to university events, removal from leadership roles, prohibition from representing the university, and potentially referral for removal by the governor.
Trustee Mike Balow voiced his strong opposition, labeling the policy as an “abomination” that could target trustees who challenge decisions. He argued, “This document leaves it wide open to be used in a retaliatory measure against any trustee (who) says something that is unpopular at any given moment.”
Board Chair Briana Scott, defending the updates, stated that the policy had not been revised since 2020. She argued that the changes reinforce the board’s existing obligations and responsibilities. Scott noted, “For those who may be asking why now during a special board meeting on a Sunday night, I say there is never the wrong time to do the right thing.”
State Sen. Jim Runestad expressed his concerns publicly, suggesting the policy might gag board members. In a Facebook post, he questioned the board’s loyalty, asking, “Who do these trustees actually answer to?”
Amber McCann, an MSU spokesperson, mentioned a similar policy exists at Wayne State University, though its consequences for violations remain unclear.
The Association of Governing Boards highlighted the importance of balancing open dialogue with confidentiality and fiduciary responsibilities. Their statement emphasized, “Effective governance generally depends on balancing open dialogue and transparency with the board’s responsibility to deliberate constructively, protect confidential matters, and govern in the best interests of the institution.”
Trustee Rebecca Bahar-Cook insisted the policy does not suppress important discussions. Instead, she emphasized the need for professionalism and constructive forums for discussion. “Strong governance ensures that all trustees have a voice but we need to be professional, we need to be accurate and we need to do it in a forum in which we are elected to do it,” she stated.
As the debate continues, Trustee Rema Vassar plans to seek a constitutional review of the policy, expressing concerns about potential parallels with past university controversies.
___
This story was originally published by Bridge Michigan and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
