Jeffries Criticizes PA Republicans for Backing Trump’s Budget Bill

House passes tax bill, Jeffries calls out Bresnahan, vote reaction divided

The passage of President Donald Trump’s $4.5 trillion budget bill by a narrow margin in the House has stirred significant political discussion. The bill, which was approved by a close 218-214 vote, has drawn both support and criticism from various quarters, highlighting the ongoing debate over its implications.

Among the Pennsylvania representatives who voted in favor were Rob Bresnahan, Dan Meuser, Ryan Mackenzie, and Glenn Thompson. These congressmen had also supported a prior version of the bill in the House on May 22.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized the decision of these representatives, especially targeting Bresnahan. Jeffries questioned the decision to support a bill that would potentially cut Medicaid and food stamp benefits, emphasizing the impact on thousands in Bresnahan’s district. “Why would anyone vote for this dangerous and extreme bill?” Jeffries asked at a Capitol news conference.

Jeffries’s remarks were part of a broader critique aimed at several Republican lawmakers nationwide, including Rep. Scott Perry of York County. Despite Jeffries’s pointed criticism, Bresnahan defended his decision, stating that his vote was in line with his commitment to his constituents.

Not all Republicans supported the bill. Notably, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania voted against it, joining all Democrats in opposition.

Record-breaking Speech by Jeffries

Jeffries delivered a marathon speech on the House floor, speaking for 8 hours and 44 minutes—a record duration. Despite his efforts, the bill progressed, drawing attention to its controversial provisions.

Critics claim the bill would disproportionately benefit the wealthy through tax cuts while removing essential benefits for many. Proponents argue that the tax cuts will aid various demographics, including senior citizens and those working in service industries. They maintain that the bill aims to restrict benefits to undocumented immigrants and impose work or education requirements for others.

Bresnahan’s Role Under Scrutiny

Bresnahan’s backing of both the initial and Senate versions of the bill has drawn attention, particularly from Democratic opponents aiming to capture his swing district in the upcoming elections. Bresnahan narrowly won his seat last November, and the contest is expected to be fiercely competitive.

Reactions to the vote varied widely:

• From Bresnahan:

“This bill delivers on the promise I made to the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania by providing the largest working-class tax cuts in American history, eliminating taxes on tips and overtime, and securing the southern border.”

• From Meuser:

“The One Big Beautiful Bill is a direct response to what the American people have demanded—secure borders, lower costs, greater opportunity, and an accountable government that works for them, not against them,” Meuser said.

• From Thompson:

“This week, House and Senate Republicans delivered a significant win for American families, workers, and small businesses by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—a bold step toward restoring prosperity, security, and strength.”

• From Fitzpatrick:

“However, it was the Senate’s amendments to Medicaid, in addition to several other Senate provisions, that altered the analysis for our PA-1 community,” Fitzpatrick noted.

• Gov. Josh Shapiro:

Gov. Shapiro, a Democrat, tweeted his disapproval, calling the bill “shameful” and warning of its negative impact on Pennsylvania, including healthcare cuts and energy job losses.

• From Alisha Hoffman-Mirilovich:

The Executive Director of Action Together NEPA criticized Bresnahan for his support, accusing him of breaking promises to his constituents and prioritizing billionaire interests over community welfare.

Latest News