This coverage is made possible through a partnership between BPR and Grist, a nonprofit environmental media organization.
Duke Energy’s Commitment to Energy Cost Reduction Faces Scrutiny
North Carolina is at the center of a debate over energy costs as Duke Energy aligns itself with the federal Ratepayer Protection Pledge. The utility’s promise to mitigate the electricity expenses associated with data centers has attracted the attention of state officials, urging for more concrete commitments.
The Ratepayer Protection Pledge, initially introduced by the Trump administration, aims to address the impact of increased data center demand on electricity rates. In a recent expansion of the pledge, President Trump announced its adoption by numerous stakeholders, including major tech companies and utilities such as Duke Energy and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Read more about the pledge here.
While Duke Energy has taken steps to address these concerns through its Customer Protection Plus framework, North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson is pushing for a legally binding agreement. Jackson advocates for Duke to solidify its commitments by signing a new tariff with the North Carolina Utilities Commission, ensuring energy costs are not transferred to consumers.
“So now the question is, did Duke do that just to please the federal administration or are they serious about it?” Jackson questioned. “Are they willing to join us and actually put it in writing to the Utilities Commission and say we hereby agree to do this and protect the costs, make sure they’re not shifted onto families?”
Jackson’s proposal emphasizes the introduction of a large load tariff, which would require significant energy consumers, such as data centers, to shoulder the costs associated with their electricity usage and infrastructure needs. This is particularly relevant as data centers consume energy levels comparable to small towns, posing a challenge for utility companies.
Earlier this year, Duke Energy proposed an 18% rate increase, citing growing electricity demand driven by population growth and data center requirements. However, following objections from the state, a settlement was reached with the N.C. Utilities Commission, reducing the increase to 9.5%.
According to Duke spokesperson Jeffrey Brooks, the company’s current load share is approximately 1%, with expectations of a 13% increase in the near future. Brooks noted, “Our analysis shows us that large load customers, like data centers, will not only pay for the costs required to serve them, but they will also contribute additional revenue to help keep costs lower for other customers as well, and that’s going to remain the case regardless of whether a large load tariff is established or not.”
Across North Carolina, the rapid expansion of data centers has sparked environmental and energy-related concerns, transcending political boundaries. Communities are grappling with the implications of AI-driven data center construction, including impacts on landscapes, water resources, energy rates, and air quality. This growth has led to numerous local governments enacting moratoriums and bans, with Hot Springs recently voting for a one-year moratorium earlier this month.
As the conversation continues, stakeholders remain vigilant about the future trajectory of energy costs and the environmental footprint of data centers, with ongoing discussions about tariffs and other regulatory measures.
