Wisconsin-Based Organization Monitors Global Nuclear Threats Amid Tensions
As tensions rise between Iran, Israel, and the United States over nuclear capabilities, a longstanding organization originally from Wisconsin is working diligently to track nuclear proliferation worldwide. This group has been pivotal in analyzing Iran’s nuclear pursuits.
The Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, which started in 1986 and is now headquartered in Washington, D.C., provides crucial data and insights used by governments and media across the globe to evaluate nuclear threats.
Valerie Lincy, the executive director, emphasized to WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” the importance of their mission, stating, “These are the world’s most destructive weapons.” She highlighted the potential threat from nations like North Korea, which although not currently in the spotlight, retains the capability to target the U.S. with nuclear weapons.
Lincy stressed the need for a multi-faceted approach to mitigate these risks, including diplomacy, sanctions, and even military interventions, as seen recently.
In discussions with “Wisconsin Today,” Lincy delved into the origins of the project and provided her perspective on the Iran conflict.
Rob Ferrett: How does the Wisconsin Project gather intelligence on nuclear developments in countries like Iran?
Valerie Lincy: We utilize open-source investigations, analyzing publicly available governmental data, sanctions, trade, and shipment information. Our focus is on identifying proliferation, supply chains, and sanctions evasion.
RF: Can you share more about the history of The Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control?
VL: The organization was initiated by Gary Milhollin, a former Nuclear Regulatory Commission judge, almost four decades ago. His vision was to halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction by preventing the trade of related materials, a mission we continue to uphold.
RF: Who benefits from the information provided by the Wisconsin Project?
VL: Our data supports media, the public, and especially government agencies worldwide. We collaborate with Export Control Officials in over 40 countries, offering training to curb proliferation.
RF: There are conflicting views regarding the impact of recent U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. What’s your take?
VL: It’s challenging to determine the exact impact, as the extent of damage to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure remains unclear due to strikes from both the U.S. and Israel.
RF: Prior to this conflict, what was Iran’s status on nuclear development?
VL: Iran had the capability to develop nuclear weapons, though U.S. intelligence previously believed it had not committed to doing so. However, recent Israeli intelligence suggests this stance may have shifted.
